简介
Editorial
Joint Editors
- Jody Wong
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Percy Wong
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Philip Hung
- The Taxation Institute of Hong Kong
- Kelvin Mak
- The Taxation Institute of Hong Kong
- Webster Ng
- The Taxation Institute of Hong Kong
Editorial Consultants
- Agnes Cheng
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Nigel Eastaway
- MHA MacIntyre Hudson
- Michael Olesnicky
- KPMG, HK
- Charles Swenson
- University of Southern California, USA
- Daniel Thornton
- Queen's University, Canada
- Jefferson VanderWolk
- Squire Patton Boggs, USA
- Marcellus Wong
- AMTD Group
Editorial Board Members
- Brian Andrew
- University of Wollongong
- Wilson Cheng
- Ernst & Young Tax Services Limited
- Cheng Chi
- KPMG, China
- Sarah Chin
- Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, HK
- Jeremy Choi
- PricewaterhouseCoopers, HK
- Spencer Chong
- PricewaterhouseCoopers, HK
- Wilson Chow
- The University of Hong Kong
- Daniel Ho
- Hong Kong Baptist University
- Patrick Ho
- FTMS Training System Limited
- Betty Kwok
- The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong
- Simon James
- University of Exeter
- Jeyapalan Kasipillai
- Monash University Malaysia
- Patrick Kwong
- Ernst & Young Tax Services Limited
- Stephen Lee
- Sinotax Services Limited
- Thomas Lee
- Thomas Lee & Partners
- Tak Yan Leung
- Open University of Hong Kong
- Aldous Mak
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Haking Wong)
- Poh Eng Hin
- Nanyang Technology University
- Anthony Tam
- Mazars
- Kalloe Vinod
- KPMG, Netherlands
- Fergus Wong
- PricewaterhouseCoopers, HK
- Chris Xing
- KPMG, China
- Eugene Yeung
- KPMG, China
Letters From The Editors
The ongoing work of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on Pillar Two is gathering momentum. As noted in our last letter, the OECD published the blueprints on Pillar One and Pillar Two of the BEPS 2.0 project in October 2020. Pillar Two aims to ensure that large multinational enterprises pay at least a minimum level of tax. On 18 May 2021, the European Commission published its Communication on “Business Taxation for the 21st Century”. In the short term, the Commission sets out a targeted initiative to ensure greater public transparency on the taxes paid by businesses by requesting certain large companies operating in the EU to publish their effective tax rates on the basis of the methodology under discussion in Pillar Two of the OECD negotiations. The Commission also proposed to introduce Pillar Two to the criteria for assessing third countries/areas in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions to incentivise them to join the international agreement. This may be alarming recalling that Hong Kong was once placed on the non-cooperative list until March 2019.
Two days later, on 20 May 2021, the US Treasury Department announced its support for a global minimum corporate tax rate of at least 15 per cent, which is below the 21 per cent minimum it has been seeking to impose on the foreign profits of US-based companies, to end the “race to the bottom” on corporate taxation. On 5 June 2021, the meetings of the Group of Seven finance ministers reached a landmark deal to back a global minimum tax of at least 15 per cent. This will put pressure on other countries to follow suit, including at the meeting of the G20 which is due to be held in July 2021.
These developments will have an important impact on many jurisdictions, including Hong Kong, which is appealing to businesses due to the low tax burden. Hong Kong was ranked the seventh largest tax haven in the world and the largest in Asia in 2021, ahead of Singapore at number nine, according to the Tax Justice Network. While the corporate tax rate in Hong Kong is 16.5 per cent, the effective tax rate is significantly below 15 per cent due to various tax incentives and the territorial source principle. Hong Kong has to respond swiftly. According to the Budget Speech delivered by the Financial Secretary on 24 February 2021, being an international financial and business centre, Hong Kong would be committed to implementing the BEPS 2.0 proposals according to the international consensus, while minimising the compliance burden on affected corporations and the impact on local SMEs where possible when drawing up the response measures. The Government will strive to maintain the simplicity, certainty, and fairness of the local tax regime and will keep up its efforts to improve the business environment and enhance its competitiveness with a view to attracting multinational corporations to invest and operate in Hong Kong.
Over the past few months, a number of laws have been enacted in Hong Kong. On 29 January 2021, the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Tax Concessions for Carried Interest) Bill 2021 was gazetted; the Bill sought to provide profits tax and salaries tax concessions in relation to particular types of carried interest received by, or accrued to, qualifying persons and qualifying employees from the provision of investment management services. Given that tax consideration is one of the key factors influencing the choice of jurisdiction for fund domiciliation and operations, it is hoped that the tax concessions will attract more private equity funds to operate in Hong Kong, thereby boosting investment management and related activities that would further create business opportunities in related professional services and bring economic benefits to Hong Kong. The Bill was passed on 28 April 2021.
The Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2021 was gazetted on 19 March 2021; it dealt with the long-awaited codification of the tax treatment for the amalgamation of companies under court-free procedures, and the transfer or succession of certain capital assets. Previously, the tax treatments had been based on the administrative practices of the Inland Revenue Department since the amended Companies Ordinance came into operation in March 2014. The Bill also dealt with enhancing the statutory framework for the furnishing of tax returns, paving the way for mandatory electronic filing of profits tax returns in the future after the development of a new Business Tax Portal is completed by 2025, as well as enhancing the current provisions for the deduction of foreign tax paid in respect of certain income, profits, or gains. The Bill was passed on 2 June 2021.
In relation to stamp duty, the Stamp Duty (Amendment) Bill 2020, which reverted the ad valorem stamp duty on non-residential property transactions to the rates under Scale 2 retrospectively from 26 November 2020, was passed by the Legislative Council on 17 March 2021. To increase Government revenue and ease the fiscal deficit amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, the Revenue (Stamp Duty) Bill 2021 was introduced to raise the rate of stamp duty on stock transfers from 0.1% to 0.13% with effect from 1 August 2021; the Bill was passed on 2 June 2021.
In this issue of the Journal, readers will, as usual, find a variety of articles contributed by a wide spectrum of authors. In the Hong Kong column, in addition to the usual review of recent Board of Review cases, one article examines the changing role of taxation in fiscal policy in the past 150 years and its prospective future, while another one looks at the practical issues in claiming the enhanced deduction for research and development expenditures.
In the International column, one article examines the practical issue of tax resident and permanent establishment exposures arising from the travel restrictions on personnel amidst the pandemic. Another article explores the Indian tax implications for a tax resident holding an individual retirement account in the United States.
An overview of the tax system in Luxembourg is featured in the Belt and Road column, while the Institute’s budget proposals and commentary for 2021/22 are presented in the Budget column.
We would like to express our heartfelt thanks to the authors for contributing the insightful articles. Our special thanks go to the reviewers for their valuable comments. Last but not least, we wish to thank our readers for their continued support. We hope you will enjoy reading the Journal. We welcome any comments and suggestions to improve its content and quality. The Letter to the Editors column is for you to voice your views and suggestions on any tax matters, be they policy issues or practical matters. We need your support for this column.
The Joint Editors
July 2021
Two days later, on 20 May 2021, the US Treasury Department announced its support for a global minimum corporate tax rate of at least 15 per cent, which is below the 21 per cent minimum it has been seeking to impose on the foreign profits of US-based companies, to end the “race to the bottom” on corporate taxation. On 5 June 2021, the meetings of the Group of Seven finance ministers reached a landmark deal to back a global minimum tax of at least 15 per cent. This will put pressure on other countries to follow suit, including at the meeting of the G20 which is due to be held in July 2021.
These developments will have an important impact on many jurisdictions, including Hong Kong, which is appealing to businesses due to the low tax burden. Hong Kong was ranked the seventh largest tax haven in the world and the largest in Asia in 2021, ahead of Singapore at number nine, according to the Tax Justice Network. While the corporate tax rate in Hong Kong is 16.5 per cent, the effective tax rate is significantly below 15 per cent due to various tax incentives and the territorial source principle. Hong Kong has to respond swiftly. According to the Budget Speech delivered by the Financial Secretary on 24 February 2021, being an international financial and business centre, Hong Kong would be committed to implementing the BEPS 2.0 proposals according to the international consensus, while minimising the compliance burden on affected corporations and the impact on local SMEs where possible when drawing up the response measures. The Government will strive to maintain the simplicity, certainty, and fairness of the local tax regime and will keep up its efforts to improve the business environment and enhance its competitiveness with a view to attracting multinational corporations to invest and operate in Hong Kong.
Over the past few months, a number of laws have been enacted in Hong Kong. On 29 January 2021, the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Tax Concessions for Carried Interest) Bill 2021 was gazetted; the Bill sought to provide profits tax and salaries tax concessions in relation to particular types of carried interest received by, or accrued to, qualifying persons and qualifying employees from the provision of investment management services. Given that tax consideration is one of the key factors influencing the choice of jurisdiction for fund domiciliation and operations, it is hoped that the tax concessions will attract more private equity funds to operate in Hong Kong, thereby boosting investment management and related activities that would further create business opportunities in related professional services and bring economic benefits to Hong Kong. The Bill was passed on 28 April 2021.
The Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2021 was gazetted on 19 March 2021; it dealt with the long-awaited codification of the tax treatment for the amalgamation of companies under court-free procedures, and the transfer or succession of certain capital assets. Previously, the tax treatments had been based on the administrative practices of the Inland Revenue Department since the amended Companies Ordinance came into operation in March 2014. The Bill also dealt with enhancing the statutory framework for the furnishing of tax returns, paving the way for mandatory electronic filing of profits tax returns in the future after the development of a new Business Tax Portal is completed by 2025, as well as enhancing the current provisions for the deduction of foreign tax paid in respect of certain income, profits, or gains. The Bill was passed on 2 June 2021.
In relation to stamp duty, the Stamp Duty (Amendment) Bill 2020, which reverted the ad valorem stamp duty on non-residential property transactions to the rates under Scale 2 retrospectively from 26 November 2020, was passed by the Legislative Council on 17 March 2021. To increase Government revenue and ease the fiscal deficit amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, the Revenue (Stamp Duty) Bill 2021 was introduced to raise the rate of stamp duty on stock transfers from 0.1% to 0.13% with effect from 1 August 2021; the Bill was passed on 2 June 2021.
In this issue of the Journal, readers will, as usual, find a variety of articles contributed by a wide spectrum of authors. In the Hong Kong column, in addition to the usual review of recent Board of Review cases, one article examines the changing role of taxation in fiscal policy in the past 150 years and its prospective future, while another one looks at the practical issues in claiming the enhanced deduction for research and development expenditures.
In the International column, one article examines the practical issue of tax resident and permanent establishment exposures arising from the travel restrictions on personnel amidst the pandemic. Another article explores the Indian tax implications for a tax resident holding an individual retirement account in the United States.
An overview of the tax system in Luxembourg is featured in the Belt and Road column, while the Institute’s budget proposals and commentary for 2021/22 are presented in the Budget column.
We would like to express our heartfelt thanks to the authors for contributing the insightful articles. Our special thanks go to the reviewers for their valuable comments. Last but not least, we wish to thank our readers for their continued support. We hope you will enjoy reading the Journal. We welcome any comments and suggestions to improve its content and quality. The Letter to the Editors column is for you to voice your views and suggestions on any tax matters, be they policy issues or practical matters. We need your support for this column.
The Joint Editors
July 2021